Cyber4Z in short

Cyber4Z started in 2015 with two specialists experienced in the cybersecurity domain. We now have a team with various capabilities in the field of strategic and tactical design of cyber security, IT, Privacy and Blockchain technology.

In addition, we are involved in technical and tactical implementations of complex security challenges that focus on the acceptance of new technologies in a pragmatic way. With our expertise and experience, we can guarantee the business objectives of our clients. These are widely determined by laws and regulations, customer requirements and rules of compliance.

  • Predict

  • Prevent

  • Detect

  • Respond

  • Remediate

Who are we?

Our team consists of certified professionals. Quality is our top priority. The technical and tactical implementations we deliver from the strategic design can be externally certified against the ISO9001, ISO27001, NEN7510 or other standards. Therewith we can have our quality tested externally as well. In addition, we provide operational knowledge when it comes to technical security assessments such as penetration tests, project management, SOC / SIEM propositions with connecting services such as log management, vulnerability and compliance management, patch management, training in the field of privacy, security and blockchain technology.

More about Cyber4Z

Our clients


Monthly cybernote: December 2020


AP: We fail as regulator

Companies have little to fear from the Dutch Data Protection Authority (AP). There are almost never fines for reported violations, reports of data breaches rarely lead to an investigation and the authority is hopelessly behind the facts when it comes to monitoring new developments. The privacy regulator acknowledges that it does not fulfill the statutory duty.

This is made clear in a report by KPMG and a response from AP to those results. The research bureau paints a shocking picture of the functioning of the AP. The researchers conclude that the authority will have to expand considerably in the next cabinet term to protect citizens and help companies in 'digitizing Netherlands'.

In an explanation to the report, the AP writes that developments such as facial recognition, internet of things, algorithms, tracking software, data trading, sexting and smartphone technology "require adequate supervision." Subsequently, the accompanying documents show that the AP is lagging behind in all areas. The KPMG study also shows that the supervision of algorithms is not getting off the ground due to a lack of capacity. "This creates risks of discrimination, exclusion and violation of citizens. For effective supervision of algorithms, investments are required at the AP, "said KPMG.

AP: "Almost every organization processes personal data. As a result, we supervise more organizations than any other regulator. With the current 184 FTE, we are still unable to implement this sufficiently. By way of illustration: other 'broad' regulators such as the AFM, ACM and NVWA have 600, 641 and 2,440 FTEs respectively.

Source: www.privacynieuws.nl